Small-to-medium-sized professional services companies that primarily make money using Drupal. While not immediately obvious from the graph above, a variety of different types of companies are active in Drupal's ecosystem: Category Top contributing organizations based on the number of issue credits. While there are almost four times as many "purely sponsored" credits as "purely volunteer" credits, volunteer contribution remains very important to Drupal. This could be the case when a contributor does the necessary work to satisfy the customer's need, in addition to using their spare time to add extra functionality.įor those credits with attribution details, 16% were "purely volunteer" credits (8,433 credits), in stark contrast to the 55% that were "purely sponsored" (29,802 credits). Issue credits can be marked as "volunteer" and "sponsored" simultaneously (shown in jamadar's screenshot near the top of this post). These types of contributions are valuable and often a stepping stone towards more in-depth contribution. removing deprecated code, fixing coding style issues, etc) or in some cases non-product credits rather than new feature development or fixing complex bugs. Most of their credits were the result of smaller patches (e.g. It's also nice to see two new contributors make the top 30 this year - Alona O'neill with sponsorship from Hook 42 and Thalles Ferreira with sponsorship from CI&T. We value the organizations that sponsor these remarkable individuals, because without their support, it could be more challenging for these individuals to be in the top 30. Their sponsorship details are provided later in this article. It's also important to recognize that most of the top 30 contributors are sponsored by an organization. These Drupalists' dedication and continued contribution to the project has been crucial to Drupal's development. Out of the top 30 contributors featured this year, 28 were active contributors in the 2017-2018 period as well. These individuals put an incredible amount of time and effort into developing Drupal and its contributed projects: Rank In other words, a relatively small number of individuals do the majority of the work. Meanwhile, the top 30 contributors (the top 0.4%) account for 19% of the total credits. Who is working on Drupal?įor this report's time period, 's credit system received contributions from 8,513 different individuals and 1,137 different organizations - a meaningful increase from last year's report.Ĭonsistent with previous years, approximately 51% of the individual contributors received just one credit. The fact that the credit system is becoming more accurate in recognizing more types of Open Source contribution is both important and positive. All contributions are valuable, whether they're code contributions, or non-product and community-oriented contributions such as organizing events, giving talks, leading sprints, etc. While some of these increases reflect new contributions, others are existing contributions that are newly reported. Drupal Diversity and Inclusion Working Group, Governance Working Group). Drupal pitch deck or community working groups (e.g. DrupalCamp Delhi project, Drupal Developer Days, Drupal Europe and DrupalCon Europe), promoting Drupal (e.g. The most notable change is the large jump in "non-product credits": more and more members in the community started tracking credits for non-product activities such as organizing Drupal events (e.g. In the spring of 2015, after proposing initial ideas for giving credit, added the ability for people to attribute their work in the issues to an organization or customer, or mark it the result of volunteer efforts. The issues analyzed in this report span Drupal core and thousands of contributed projects, across all major versions of Drupal. See for the list of all issues.įor this report, we looked at all issues marked "closed" or "fixed" in the 12-month period from Jto June 30, 2019. Each issue tracks an idea, feature request, bug report, task, or more.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |